This is a very unique article how the FBI wanted to break into someone’s phone but apple said “no”.
The FBI has been asking people from Apple to help them remove the safeguards on the phone, but Apple simply said “no”, because it was invading someone's’ privacy. Apply told them what if it wasn’t one of the shooters that killed 14 people in San Bernardino, California then they would be going through someone’s phone that is innocent. On Tuesday March 1, 2016 there was a five hour session talking about the pros of opening the phone and the cons of opening the phone. Members of the house Judiciary committee creamed FBI director James Comey by telling him the pitfalls of creating security vulnerabilities. Apply argued saying if they remove the safeguards the company would have to create new software that could be exploited to break into any iphone.
In this blog I think that the FBI should have the right to get into the phone but i’m also on Apple's side because if you open that phone then people would be like well you opened that phone why can’t you open mine, also it’s going through someone’s phone without permission. I mostly agree with Apply but have a little agreement with the FBI.
To read more visit
http://www.cnet.com/news/apple-fbi-face-off-before-congress-over-iphone-encryption-san-bernardino-terrorist/
Great Job, I think its great that apple is protecting people's privacy!
ReplyDeleteJust the right length, very well written, and I love how you added your personal opinion.
ReplyDeleteLove it :)
ReplyDelete